Articles

Genting UK Highlights Risks from Proposed Machine Games Duty Rise

Lars Vogel · Sep 25, 2026

Genting UK Highlights Risks from Proposed Machine Games Duty Rise

Genting UK casino interior with gaming machines and staff preparing for operations

Genting UK, part of the Genting group, published an opinion piece that examines a proposed doubling of Machine Games Duty on gaming machines from 20% to 40% in the upcoming UK budget, and the company notes that such a change would place many land-based casinos in a position where operations become unprofitable or unsustainable. The opinion piece draws attention to several connected outcomes, including risks to hundreds of jobs, reduced investment across the sector, and lower overall Treasury revenue over time, while it also references Genting UK's own £50 million plans to transform part of the Grade II-listed London Trocadero into a mixed casino, food, drink, and entertainment venue that would create 350 to 400 permanent jobs.

Details of the Proposed Duty Change

The opinion piece from Genting UK focuses on the direct financial pressure that would follow if Machine Games Duty rises from its current 20% rate to 40%, and it explains how this adjustment would affect the cost structure of gaming machines that form a core part of land-based casino revenue. Those who have reviewed the piece observe that the company models the impact through internal assessments which show reduced margins that leave limited room for continued operation at many sites. Data from the opinion piece indicates that the higher duty would accelerate decisions around site closures or scaled-back services, and it connects these outcomes to the broader challenge of maintaining viable businesses under increased tax burdens.

Employment and Investment Concerns

Genting UK highlights risks to hundreds of jobs that depend on the continued operation of land-based casinos, and the opinion piece states that these positions span roles in gaming, hospitality, and venue management. The company further notes that reduced investment would follow because operators would lack the financial headroom to fund upgrades or expansions, and this contraction in spending would affect supply chains and local economies that rely on casino activity. Observers note that the opinion piece presents these effects as sequential, with job losses appearing first and investment declines following as operators adjust to the new tax environment.

Genting UK's Specific Development Plans

London Trocadero building exterior showing historic architecture and planned mixed-use development area

The opinion piece also outlines Genting UK's £50 million plans to convert part of the Grade II-listed London Trocadero into a mixed-use venue that combines casino facilities with food, drink, and entertainment options, and it states that this project would generate between 350 and 400 permanent jobs once completed. The company presents these plans as an example of the type of investment that could face delays or cancellation if the higher Machine Games Duty takes effect, because the increased tax would alter projected returns. Figures in the opinion piece show that the Trocadero development is intended to revitalise a historic site while expanding employment in central London, and Genting UK connects the viability of this project to the stability of the current duty rate.

According to the opinion piece, the proposed tax increase carries implications for Treasury revenue because closures or reduced activity at casinos would shrink the taxable base, and the company argues that a higher rate applied to fewer operational machines could yield less total income than the existing rate applied across a larger number of sites. The piece references company modelling that supports this outcome, although it does not release the underlying calculations. Those who have examined similar tax changes in other jurisdictions have seen comparable patterns where elevated rates coincide with lower overall collections when business activity contracts.

Broader Sector Context Within the Story

The opinion piece situates Genting UK's position within the wider land-based casino sector, and it notes that many operators would encounter the same profitability thresholds if Machine Games Duty doubles. The company emphasises that the duty applies specifically to gaming machines, which distinguishes it from other forms of casino taxation, and it explains how this targeted increase would affect a revenue stream that supports overall venue sustainability. Data referenced in the piece shows that machine gaming contributes substantially to daily takings at many sites, which means the duty change would have an immediate effect on cash flow.

Genting UK further states that the combination of job losses, reduced investment, and lower Treasury revenue forms an interconnected set of consequences that would materialise if the budget measure proceeds unchanged. The opinion piece appears on City A.M. and presents these points as factual assessments drawn from the company's operational experience. City A.M.

Conclusion

The opinion piece from Genting UK therefore centres on the proposed Machine Games Duty increase and its projected effects on land-based casinos, employment levels, investment activity, and government revenue, while it also describes the company's £50 million Trocadero project and the jobs it would support. The document connects these elements through company modelling and sector observations, and it presents the information as a direct response to the upcoming budget decision. Readers can review the full opinion piece to examine the specific figures and arguments Genting UK advances regarding the duty change.